tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3364570834099131201.post9109281035744335193..comments2024-03-23T08:57:50.965-04:00Comments on ECG Interpretation: ECG Blog #79 — Normal Q Wave, T Wave InversionECG Interpretationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02309020028961384995noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3364570834099131201.post-31594377722843658442015-12-30T14:16:10.015-05:002015-12-30T14:16:10.015-05:00Even if the QRS complex is predominantly positive ...Even if the QRS complex is predominantly positive — an isolated inverted T wave in either lead III or lead aVF is not necessarily indicative of ischemia if that is the only abnormality seen.ECG Interpretationhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02309020028961384995noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3364570834099131201.post-38968991014978643762015-12-30T08:32:16.441-05:002015-12-30T08:32:16.441-05:00Hello Prof.Ken
Regarding T wave inversion in the ...Hello Prof.Ken<br /> Regarding T wave inversion in the diagram(lead III,aVF)<br />Is it normal to see T wave inversion in those leads (III,aVF) which have predominantly positive QRS , I know that T wave axis lags just behind the QRS axis (negative T is common with negative QRS ) .<br /> In the above diagram lead III,aVF<br />(second complex in each lead) , the QRS is predominantly positive and has negative T wave.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05970052419585147425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3364570834099131201.post-27140722948123864062015-09-12T06:59:36.364-04:002015-09-12T06:59:36.364-04:00The T wave may at times normally be upright in lea...The T wave may at times normally be upright in lead V1. This is not necessarily "early repolarization" ...ECG Interpretationhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02309020028961384995noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3364570834099131201.post-87884874114137542912015-09-07T00:58:05.462-04:002015-09-07T00:58:05.462-04:00What are the causes of upright T wave in V1 ? othe...What are the causes of upright T wave in V1 ? other than subtle LAD occlusion ? Can it be normal variation as in Benign early repolarization ?<br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06475696764299734880noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3364570834099131201.post-31948085620817836602013-11-23T05:19:13.747-05:002013-11-23T05:19:13.747-05:00Thank you Vince. This is a TRUE compliment coming ...Thank you Vince. This is a TRUE compliment coming from you! - :)ECG Interpretationhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02309020028961384995noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3364570834099131201.post-5687681266621296292013-11-22T23:03:26.244-05:002013-11-22T23:03:26.244-05:00I love your write-ups because they really emphasiz...I love your write-ups because they really emphasize the breadth of knowledge and understanding that is required for what may seem like simple interpretations. It would be very easy to just say label this a normal ECG and call it a day, but justifying why it is (probably) normal requires understanding so many other aspects of the ECG. Most authors usually just use a line like "T-waves may be upright or inverted in lead III" and leave it at that, but that does nothing to explain why the finding can be normal or when it's worrisome. It also makes it seem like the T-wave polarity in III is at the whims of chance when really there's a perfectly legitimate reason why normal some folks are upright and others inverted. Thanks again for what you do.Vince Dhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10636259293820649555noreply@blogger.com