Monday, December 4, 2017

ECG Blog #144 — An Alternating BBB?


The ECG and long-lead II rhythm strip shown in Figure-1 was obtained from a 58-year old man who was admitted to the hospital with a history of chest pain and “fatigue”.
  • How would you interpret the tracing?
  • Is there 3:1 and/or “high-grade” AV block?
  • How many different types of conduction disturbances can you identify?
  • Is there ECG evidence of a cause?
  • What treatment is likely to be needed?

Figure-1: 12-lead ECG with long lead II rhythm strip obtained from a 58-year old man with chest pain and fatigue.


----------------------------------------------------------
Interpretation: This is a complex tracing. The easiest way I have found to derive the mechanism for complex arrhythmias such as this one — begins with the simple step of numbering the beats and labeling the P waves (Figure-2).
  • NOTE: The value of using calipers as an aid for interpreting complex arrhythmias cannot be overemphasized. Using calipers allows you to rapidly determine if P wave and QRS rhythms are regular or not, and whether beats are (or are not) likely to be conducting. With minimal practice — you’ll find calipers dramatically increase your speed for interpretation, as well as improving your accuracy. The cardiologist who does not regularly use calipers to interpret complex arrhythmias will miss the diagnosis on more than one occasion …

-----------------------------------------------------------

RED arrows in Figure-2 below indicate all P waves on the long lead II rhythm strip at the bottom of Figure-1. What conclusions can you now draw about this rhythm?

Figure-2: The beats from Figure-1 have been numbered. P waves have been labeled (RED arrows — See text).


-----------------------------------------------------------

Interpretation of Figure-2: Red arrows show regular occurrence of P waves with similar morphology. Thus, there is an underlying sinus rhythm.
  • The reason for slight variation in the P-P interval, is that there is sinus arrhythmia. (NOTE: A special type of sinus arrhythmia, known as “ventriculophasic sinus arrhythmia” — is commonly seen in association with 2nd- or 3rd-degree AV block, and this is probably what we are seeing here).
  • Some beats in Figure-2 are conducting! Note that the PR interval preceding beats #1, 3, 5 and 7 is constant (albeit slightly prolonged beyond 0.20 second in duration). This means that beats #1, 3, 5 and 7 in Figure-2 are all being conducted (albeit with 1st-Degree AV Block).
  • That said — other sinus P waves are not being conducted! We know that some of the other P waves are not being conducted — because there is no QRS complex near many of these other on-time but non-conducting P waves.
  • Since the atrial rate (P-P interval) is regular (or at least, fairly regular) — and since some P waves conduct but others don’t — this means that some type of 2nd-Degree AV Block is present. This cannot be complete (3rd-degree) AV block — because there is some conduction!

QUESTION: Can you think ahead as to which type of 2nd-degree AV block is present in Figure-2? Does this represent Mobitz I? — or Mobitz II? — or high-grade AV block? — or, some indeterminate form of 2nd-degree AV block?

-----------------------------------------------------------
Next STEP: Can you figure out which of the lettered P waves in Figure-3 have a chance to conduct, yet still fail to do so?
  • To clarify which P waves are (or are not) conducting, we have made Figure-3 — in which we label each of the P waves in the long lead II rhythm strip.

Figure-3: We have labeled all P waves in Figure-2 with letters. Which of these P waves have a chance to conduct, yet fail to do so?


---------------------------------
Interpretation of Figure-3: As already noted — the P waves labeled a, d, g and j are all conducting (because the PR interval preceding beats #1, 3, 5 and 7 is constant).
  • One should expect the P waves labeled b, e, and h to be able to conduct — because these P waves all occur near the middle of the R-R interval, at a time when no part of the conduction system should still be refractory. The fact that these on-time P waves do not conduct — is what tells us that there is 2nd-Degree AV Block.
  • This leaves us with the P waves labeled c, f, and i. These P waves are not conducting — because no QRS complex follows them. However, these P waves labeled c, f and i never have a chance to conduct — because they occur immediately after beats #2, 4 and 6. That is, the P waves labeled c, f, and i all occur during the absolute refractory period that immediately follows the QRS complexes that precede them.
  • NOTE: The term, “high-grade” AV Block means that more than 1 on-time P wave in a row that has a chance to conduct, fails to do so. We can not diagnose “high-grade” AV block in Figure-3 — because we never see 2 P waves in a row that have a chance to conduct yet fail to do so. It could be entirely possible that IF beats # 2, 4 and 6 were delayed a little bit more — that the P waves labeled c, f, and i would then have a chance to conduct.

Q
UESTION:
What should we call beats #2, 4 and 6?

  • HINT: In Figure-4, we have drawn in horizontal BLUE lines to show that the distance from the onset of beats #1, 3 and 5 — until the onset of beats #2, 4 and 6 is constant. This is just one of many relationships in this this tracing that can be instantly recognized by using calipers.

Figure-4: Horizontal BLUE lines show that the distance from the onset of beats #1, 3 and 5 — until the onset of beats #2, 4 and 6 is constant. How does awareness of this relationship facilitate determining the etiology of beats #2, 4 and 6?


---------------------------------
Interpretation of Figure-4: Beats #2, 4 and 6 are escape beats. When sinus P waves fail to conduct — one hopes for emergence of an “escape” pacemaker site that will prevent development of any prolonged pauses. Escape beats most often arise from the AV Node — though they can also arise from elsewhere in the atria, from the bundle of His, or from the ventricles.
  • Escape beats are recognized because they are either not preceded by any P wave — or, because they are preceded by a P wave with a PR interval that is too short to conduct. Since most “escape” pacemakers are at least fairly regular — the R-R interval preceding escape beats tends to be fairly constant. This important clue is precisely what the equally long horizontal blue lines in Figure-4 show.
  • PEARL: It is often difficult to tell which beats in complex AV block tracings are (or are not) being conducted. Knowing that most escape rhythms are at least fairly regular — the finding of one or more QRS complexes that clearly occur earlier-than-expected is a superb clue that such early beats are probably being conducted. The slower beats that are not preceded by P waves, but which are preceded by a constant R-R interval are usually the escape beats (For review of this concept — Click HERE to go to 25:30 in our AV Block Basics Video).

---------------------------------
The Concept of an Escape-Capture Rhythm: From a descriptive standpoint — there are several useful ways to classify the rhythm we see in Figure-4.
  • There is group beating. That is, although the ventricular rhythm in Figure-4 is not completely regular — there IS a pattern. This pattern is, that shorter and longer R-R intervals alternate — with shorter intervals (as between beats #2-3; 4-5; and 6-7) being of similar duration — and longer intervals (as between beats #1-2; 3-4; and 5-6) also being of a different similar duration.
  • The rhythm in Figure-4 is a bigeminal rhythm. This is just another way of stating that the pattern of this rhythm repeats every-other-beat.
  • There is Escape-Capture” Bigeminy. As we have discussed earlier — beat #2 is an “escape” beat — because it occurs after a short pause that is longer than the R-R interval that precedes sinus beats. Beat #3 is a “capture” beat — because the on-time sinus P wave that precedes it (ie, the P wave labeled “d) occurs at a moment during the R-R interval when the conduction system has recovered, and is able to conduct this P wave to the ventricles. This is followed by another escape beat (beat #4) — and then another “capture” beat (the P wave labeled “g” is able to conduct). This sequence then repeats.

---------------------------------

SYNTHESIS: The rhythm in Figure-4 represents a form of 2nd-degree AV block. There is group beating, with repetitive short-long sequences. If we look at each sequence as beginning with a P wave that conducts (beats #1, 3, 5, 7) — the next P wave in each sequence fails to conduct (b, e, h). Before we can tell if the 3rd P wave in each sequence will be able to conduct — an escape beat arises (beats # 2, 4, 6). But this 3rd P wave in each sequence (ie, the P waves labeled c, f and i) never have a chance to conduct ...
  • We cannot determine IF the rhythm in Figure-4 represents Mobitz I or Mobitz II — because we never see 2 consecutive P waves conducting. That is, we cannot tell if the PR interval would lengthen (as it should with Mobitz I AV block) — because we never see 2 consecutively conducted QRS complexes.
  • We also cannot tell if the form of 2nd-degree AV block in Figure-4 represents “high-grade” AV block — because we never see 2 P waves in a row that should conduct, yet fail to do so.
  • The P-P interval in Figure-4 is ~5 large boxes in duration. This corresponds to an atrial rate of ~60/minute.
  • The R-R interval of the escape beats in Figure-4 (ie, the length of the horizontal blue lines) — is ~8 large boxes. This corresponds to an escape rate just under 40/minute. Thus, an important problem here is bradycardia … It is entirely possible that if either the atrial or escape rates were a little faster — that there would be 2:1 (instead of 3:1) AV conduction.
  • If we now change how we look at the repetitive sequences in Figure-4, so that instead of beginning each sequence with a sinus-conducted beat, we begin with an escape beat (ie, with beats #2, 4, 6) — we then have repetitive long-short sequences — which is how the name “escape-capture” was derived.
  • PEARL: It is well to appreciate that “Escape-Capture” Bigeminy (as is seen in Figure-4) is a common manifestation of 2nd-degree AV block.

---------------------------------
Remaining Issues: Several questions remain regarding this case. These include:
  • Why is the QRS complex wide?
  • Why are there 2 different morphologies for QRS complexes in the long lead II rhythm strip?
  • What does the 12-lead ECG show? Is there a clue on the 12-lead tracing to the reason why this patient developed AV block?

---------------------------------

Addressing the Remaining Issues: To facilitate addressing these remaining issues — We repost a less cluttered 12-lead ECG (Figure-5).

Figure-5: Why does QRS morphology change in the long lead II rhythm strip? How would you interpret the 12-lead ECG? Technical Note: The 12-lead ECG is simultaneously recorded with the long lead II rhythm strip at the bottom. Unfortunately, due to the way in which lead changes are recorded — we do not see beat #2 in leads I, II and III of the 12-lead ECG (but we do see all of the other beats).


---------------------------------
Interpretation of Figure-5: Now that we have elucidated the behavior of atrial activity in this arrhythmia — we need to address QRST morphology.
  • Note that there are 2 different QRS morphologies. The QRS complex appears to be widened for both of these morphologies. Looking first at QRS morphology for the sinus-conducted beats (ie, for beats #1, 3, 5 and 7) — the monophasic R wave in lead I for beat #1 — with predominantly negative QRS for beat #5 in lead V1 — with monophasic R wave for beat #7 in lead V6 — are consistent with LBBB as the reason why conducted beats #1, 3, 5 and 7 are wide.
  • Although beats #2, 4 and 6 do not appear to be wide in the long lead II rhythm strip at the bottom of the tracing — a look at simultaneously obtained beat #4 in lead V1, and beat #6 in leads V4, V5 and V6 tells us that beats #2, 4 and 6 are in fact widened. The rSR’ for beat #4 in lead V1 — together with the wide terminal S wave for beat #6 in lead V6 — are consistent with RBBB as the reason why escape beats #2, 4 and 6 are wide.
  • The escape beats could be arising either from the AV Node or the Bundle of His. In either case — escape beats manifest an alternating form of bundle branch block compared to sinus-conducted beats that consistently manifest LBBB conduction.
  • NOTE: Although the term, “trifascicular block” has been discouraged in recent years because of potential ambiguity — this tracing clearly manifests signs of severe and multi-level conduction system disturbance, including: i) 1st-degree AV block (for conducting beats #1, 3, 5 and 7); ii) an indeterminate form of 2nd-degree AV block; and iii) alternating LBBB and RBBB conduction for the escape-capture bigeminal rhythm. Unless some potentially-reversible etiology is found — a pacemaker is likely to be needed.

---------------------------------

Are there Acute Changes on the 12-Lead ECG? The final part of this tracing to assess is the ST-T wave changes on the 12-lead ECG. This assessment is especially challenging because of the multiple conduction defects that are present. We proceed as follows:
  • Regarding the sinus beats that conduct with LBBB morphology — the  ST-T wave for beat #1 in lead I manifests a T wave that is inappropriately concordant (upright) with the QRS complex in this lead. Normally, the ST-T wave should be oppositely directed to the last QRS deflection in lead I with LBBB. This finding of inappropriate T wave concordance suggests possible ischemia.
  • Much more remarkable is the persistent ST segment coving and increasingly deeper symmetric T wave inversion for escape beat #4 that is seen as one moves from lead V1-to V2-to V3. The amount of T wave inversion expected in anterior leads with RBBB should be maximal in lead V1. Especially in view of the relatively small QRS amplitude for beat #4 in leads V2 and V3 — this very deep and symmetric T wave inversion is clearly is a manifestation of ischemia, and may represent recent infarction as the precipitating cause of AV block.
  • Finally — the downward “s” wave in lead V2 for the RBBB pattern of beat #5 is fragmented. This suggests scar, and may be consistent with recent infarction.
Conclusion: Admittedly, QRST assessment is challenging on this 12-lead ECG given technical issues and extensive underlying conduction defects. Nevertheless — the findings we highlight above should raise suspicion of recent extensive infarction as the potential cause of AV block.

FINAL Interpretation of this Tracing: Underlying sinus arrhythmia with 1st-degree AV block. Escape-capture bigeminal rhythm, with 2nd-degree AV block of indeterminate severity, but with at least a 2:1 AV block conduction disturbance. Underlying LBBB for sinus-conducted beats — which alternates with RBBB for escape beats. This suggests severe conduction system disease. ST-T wave changes suggest ischemia and/or recent infarction.
-----------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------
P.S.: An “unknown” commenter (below) asked whether the P waves labeled b, e and h might actually be conducting with a very long PR interval? — because the distance from onset of each of these P waves, until the next QRS complex (ie, the distance from b-to-beat #2; e-to-beat #4; h-to-beat #6) appears to be the same! If this was true — then the PR interval “increment” would be extremely long. That is, the relative increase in PR interval for the P waves before beats #1 and 2 would be much more than is usually seen with a typical Mobitz I form of 2nd-degree AV block (ie, the PR interval for beat #2 if “b” was conducting would be over 0.80 second! ). That said, nothing else about this tracing is “typical” — and without additional ECG monitoring strips, we cannot rule out the possibility of dual AV node conduction pathways with change to the slow conduction pathway accounting for the extremely large PR interval increment from one conducting P wave to the next. In this case, the rhythm would be 2nd-degree AV block, Mobitz Type I — with the non-conducting P waves for each Wenckebach cycle being c, f and i. There would still be underlying alternating bundle branch block (from LBBB to RBBB conduction) in this patient with severe conduction system disease. A pacemaker will be needed. Moral: Some complex arrhythmias may have more than a single potentially plausible explanation!    
-----------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------
Acknowledgment: My thanks to Chu Thanh & Nguyen Chi Tinh (from Vietnam) for allowing me to use this tracing and clinical case.
-----------------------------------------------------------
  • For more on AV Blocks — Check out our Video @ www.avblockecg.com
  • For more on assessment of ST-T wave changes with BBB — Check out our Video @ www.bbbecg.com
NOTE: For any of our ECG Videos — If you click on SHOW MORE that appears under the video on the YouTube page — You will find a timed Linked Contents of all that appears in the video!
 

14 comments:

  1. Very interesting and helpful..thanks

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for this interesting case.

    As for a beginner like me it looks like as if the pr interval beginning from the p- waves b,e,h looks quite similar. And thus one might think that these p-waves are conducting the beats 2, 4 and 6. Could you explain us why this thought is wrong ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have made a NICE observation! The reason why I do not think the P waves labeled b, e and h are conducting — is that the “increment” in PR interval (ie, the difference between the PR interval before beats #1, 3, 5 that we know are conducting — and the PR interval that we would then have if b, e and h were conducting) is VERY large. It is much more than one would expect with an AV Wenckebach block. It seems far more logical that the mechanism here is “escape-capture”, with beats #2,4,6 being junctional escapes — and with b, e and h just not conducting. To complicate things further — at times there can be “dual AV nodal physiology” with both a faster and slower AV nodal pathway — in which case on occasion one can get large jumps in the PR interval increment (though even then, they are usually not this large). Bottom Line — We really need more monitoring to get a better idea of what is happening. In the meantime, I submit that this is probably “escape-capture” rather than Mobitz I with huge PR interval increment. Thanks for your comment.

      Delete
    2. Thank you very much for your explanation !

      Delete
    3. Hi — The more I think about your question, the more I cannot rule this out without additional monitoring. As a result, I added a "P.S." at the bottom of the blog to include the possibility that you raise! Thanks again for your comment — :)

      Delete
    4. I thank you, Sir for offering us students such a wonderful website !

      Delete
    5. I think the QRS morphology which changes for the beats 2,4,6 probably supports they are not arising like other sinus beats and no apparent reason for those beats to conduct with abberancy.. Dr.Ken.. Can you agree to this? Thanks in advance..

      Delete
    6. @ M G — As described in the blog, you are correct that the difference in QRS morphology for beats #2,4,6 is not because of "aberrant conduction" (because there no reason to change from LBBB to RBBB conduction). Instead, I believe this is a manifestation of the uncommon phenomenon of "alternating BBB" (ie, one beat conducts with LBBB, and the next with RBBB) — and that is generally an indication of severe underlying conduction system disease in this patient who also has significant 2nd-degree AV block — :)

      Delete
  3. Thanks for your very interesting writing , sir! Althought I also think beats# 2,4,6 are junctional escape beats with RBBB conduction because of their very typical morphology for RBBB. But I also wonder if there is possibility that they are ventricular escape beats sir. How do we distinguish between them sir?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The reason I don't think beats #2,4,6 are ventricular escapes — is the very typical QRS morphology for RBBB conduction not only for beat #4 (in lead V1) — but also for beat #6 (in V6). Marriott made the point that RBBB conduction is virtually assured when you have the reciprocal of an rSR' in V6 (ie, narrow q- taller slender R- and wide terminal S wave). You are unlikely to see this with ventricular escape ...

      Delete
  4. Devilishly complicated tracing but a great learning! Thank you so much!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Mario — a true compliment coming from you! Be sure to check out the "P.S." that I just added yesterday at the bottom of this blog piece — which makes it even MORE complicated ... (but perhaps more "fun" — :) Grazie ancora per il tuo sostegno!

      Delete
  5. This was really helpful and gave me far more ideas.

    ReplyDelete