The rhythm in Figure-1 was observed as a
previously healthy young adult was being treated for his “palpitations”. He was
hemodynamically stable at the time. Interpret the rhythm.
- What happened? Should what we see be cause for alarm?
Figure-1: Lead II rhythm strip during treatment (obtained from a patient with palpitations). Should what you see be cause for alarm? |
-----------------------------------------------------------
Note: Discussion of this
tracing is far easier if beats are labeled (Figure-2).
Figure-2: We have labeled all beats in Figure-1. |
-
----------------------------------------------------------
Interpretation: The patient is hemodynamically stable. The
first 9 beats show a regular SVT rhythm
(SupraVentricular Tachycardia) at a rate between 185-190/minute. No
atrial activity is seen during this run. The rhythm changes beginning with beat
#10.
- After the run of SVT — it is easiest to look next at beats #11,12. Both beats are clearly ventricular in etiology — since the QRS complex is wider and completely different in appearance from QRS complexes during the SVT run at the beginning of the tracing.
- Beat #10 manifests an intermediate morphology between the narrow beats before it — and the ventricular couplet that follows. Beat #10 is a fusion beat — which means it is due to simultaneous occurrence of a supraventricular and ventricular beat. Therefore, beats #10-through-12 constitute a 3-beat salvo of ventricular tachycardia. PEARL: Recognition of fusion beats can be facilitated by looking not only to see if QRS appearance is intermediate between beats occurring before and beats that come after — but also by looking to see if ST-T wave appearance is intermediate! This clearly is the case here — as T wave shape and amplitude of beat #10 is indeed intermediate between T wave shape and amplitude of beats #9 and #11.
- Note that there is conversion to sinus rhythm beginning with beat #13. Another ventricular couplet follows (beats #14,15) — with the tracing ending in a regular sinus rhythm at a normal rate.
IMPRESSION: The rhythm in Figure-2 begins
with a 9-beat run of AVNRT (AV Nodal Reentry Tachycardia). The rate of this SVT rhythm is too
fast for atrial flutter with 2:1 conduction. It is also must faster than the
usual rate range of sinus tachycardia. Abrupt conversion to sinus rhythm (beat #13) supports the diagnosis of
AVNRT, which is a common cause of “palpitations” in the young adult age group.
- We do not know if conversion to sinus rhythm was achieved by a vagal maneuver, by medication — or by a combination of the two. Regardless — the point to emphasize is that it is a common and normal phenomenon to see PVCs (including ventricular couplets or salvos) at the time of conversion from a reentry tachycardia to sinus rhythm. Therefore, there is no cause for alarm from the rhythm in Figure-2, and assuming no other concerning features, additional workup would not be indicated at this time.
---------------------------------------------------------------
For More on this Subject:
- See ECG Blog #128 and Blog #129 that review Fusion Beats in detail.
- See also these Sections from our ACLS-2013-ePub — Section 13.0 on SVTs of Uncertain Etiology — and Section 14.3 on SVT/PSVT/AVNRT.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Sir,
ReplyDeleteThank you for this informative post.
I have 1 question:
Was the diagnosis of AVNRT made because of how he responded to vagal/medication? Or can it be made by just looking at the initial SVT
I remember going through one of your video blogs mentioning of how we can confidently call a PSVT--> AVNRT if we are able to see retrograde P waves, and that the RP' interval is really short( i.e roughly less than half the ST segment) . In this case we do not see any retrograde P waves, hence can we call it AVNRT by just looking the initial SVT?
Thank you
Hi. Thanks for your comment. Diagnosis of AVNRT was based on the finding of a regular SVT rhythm at a rate as fast as 190/minute. Response to treatment I believe supports this diagnosis. Thanks again for your comments!
DeletePardon the ignorance, but I note beats 11 and 12 are very short RR, so incredibly fast (>270 bpm?). Is this not a cause for concern?
ReplyDeleteI'm "happy" those PVCs occurred — since they facilitated conversion to sinus rhythm (with a return to normal heart rate). I might worry if such very fast beats recurred .... but doesn't look like they do after beat #15 — :)
Delete