A 14-year old boy was forced to do numerous squats as a “punishment”. He woke up the next day with severe pain in his legs — and presented to the ED (Emergency Department).
- Renal function and serum electrolytes were normal — but CK was markedly elevated, leading to a diagnosis of Rhabdomyolysis.
- Cardiac monitoring revealed a series of interesting (albeit asymptomatic) rhythms, 2 of which are shown below in Figure-1.
QUESTIONS:
- How would YOU interpret Rhythms A and B in Figure-1?
- Is there any evidence of AV block?
- What treatment is indicated?
MY Approach to the Rhythm in Figure-1:
As always — I favor a systematic approach to rhythm interpretation — with use of the Ps, Qs, 3R Memory Aid (See ECG Blog #185 for more on the Ps, Qs, 3Rs).
- One need not assess the Ps, Qs, 3Rs in any particular order — as long as you always remember to assess each of these 5 parameters. As a result — I usually start with whichever of the parameters is easiest to asses. For example, in Figure-1 — it is clear that the rhythm is not Regular (albeit parts of the rhythm are almost regular) — and — the coupling interval of the early beats in B is similar.
- The QRS complex in all beats seen in Figure-1 is narrow — therefore the rhythm is supraventricular.
- At least some P waves are present! That said — Assessment of the role that P waves play in today’s rhythm is the most challenging aspect of this arrhythmia.
QUESTIONS:
- Do YOU Think any of the P waves in Figure-1 are conducting to the ventricles?
- If so — Is conduction forward or backward (ie, retrograde)? That is — Is the electrical impulse moving from the SA node — then through the Atria, and finally on to reach the ventricles? — OR — Is conduction “backward” (ie, retrograde from the AV node, to return to the atria)?
- HINT: What is the significance of the colors (RED and YELLOW) that I have chosen for atrial activity in Figure-2?
PEARL #1: As I’ve suggested many times in this ECG Blog — the most accurate (and time-efficient) way to answer the above questions is with use of calipers. Doing so allows you to instantly determine the regularity of forward-conducting P waves vs retrograde P waves.
- Without using calipers — I would have spent a lot of time guessing whether regular sinus P waves are (or are not) present. With calipers — it took me less than 5 seconds to establish the atrial rhythm!
Figure-2: I’ve added RED, PINK and YELLOW arrows to Figure-1 to highlight the relationship of P waves in these tracings to neighboring QRS complexes (See text). |
MY Step-By-Step Approach in Figure-2:
The most challenging aspect of interpreting today’s rhythm — is figuring out what’s happening with atrial activity. Below is my sequential step-by-step approach:
- I first looked in front of at all 28 beats on both tracings in Figure-1 — to see IF there were any P waves that I felt were definitely conducting. The BEST example of a P wave that I could be certain was conducting is in Rhythm A. This is the RED arrow upright P wave that appears before beat #8 with a normal PR interval ( = a PR interval = 0.18 second).
- I saw a number of other places on these 2 rhythm strips in which it looked like upright P waves might be present — although it was difficult to be certain of this. So — IF there was indeed an underlying regular atrial rhythm — the best way to look for this would be by setting my calipers to the P-P interval between 2 deflections that I know represents 2 consecutive P waves. In Figure-2 — the 2nd RED arrow in Rhythm A definitely looks like it is highlighting a P wave that occurs just after the QRS of beat #9.
- Setting my calipers to the P-P interval between these first 2 RED arrows in Rhythm A — allowed me to “walk out” a fairly regular underlying sinus rhythm (Sinus arrhythmia) in Rhythm B! Some of the P waves under these RED arrows in Rhythm B are more easily seen than others (ie, some P waves are hidden within the ST-T waves — but something is seen with each "walk" of the calipers). Given that P wave deflections can be seen under all of the RED arrows in Rhythm B — it seems logical that an “on-time” P wave is also hiding within the QRS of beat #4 (and the PINK arrow in Rhythm B suggests that we do see a tiny deflection at the very end of this QRS complex — which almost certainly represents the final portion of the "hidden" on-time P wave).
What remains to interpret — is the nature of atrial activity under the YELLOW arrows in Rhythm A.
- Since the P waves under these YELLOW arrows are negative in this lead II monitoring lead — these are retrograde (backward conducting) P waves. This is logical — since no P waves precede beats #2-thru-6 nor beats #10-thru-12 in Rhythm A — which defines these 8 QRS complexes as being junctional beats!
==========================================
Laddergram Illustration:
At this point — it might be easiest to explain details of the 2 rhythms in today's case by use of laddergrams.
- NOTE: For readers less familiar with laddergrams — I’ll emphasize that it is EASY to learn how to read laddergrams. I bet that all it will take to become comfortable reading laddergrams — is to review the explanations below for the 2 laddergrams from today's case.
- Learning to draw laddergrams takes more time and practice. For those interested — I review the basics for reading and/or drawing laddergrams in ECG Blog #188 (This blog post features links to more than 60 laddergrams that I’ve drawn for this ECG Blog over the years = more-than-enough practice to become comfortable drawing your own laddergrams!).
==========================================
Laddergrams for Today's Case:
In Figure-3 — I've drawn a laddergram to illustrate events in Rhythm A:- It is often easiest to begin with a sinus-conducted beat. According to the laddergram in Figure-3 — there is only 1 sinus-conducted beat in this tracing, which is beat #8.
- We established above that beats #2-thru-6 and #10-thru-12 in Rhythm A are junctional beats — because no P wave precedes these beats — and the QRS complex of these beats is narrow (and looks identical to the QRS complex of sinus-conducted beat #8).
- We have also established that the negative deflections after these junctional beats represent P waves from retrograde conduction (which is to be expected with junctional beats — that virtually always conduct at least partially back toward the atria).
- RED circles within the AV Nodal Tier in Figure-3 — represent the imagined point origin of these junctional beats. Note that each of these junctional beats conducts both in the forward direction (ie, down through the ventricles) — as well as retrograde (the dotted lines that return to the atria).
- Beats #2-thru-6 conduct all the way back through the atria, to produce the negative deflections seen shortly after the QRS (ie, the YELLOW arrows that appear after beats #2-thru-6).
- KEY Point: Since the sinus P wave before beat #8 is able to conduct to the ventricles — it must be that junctional beat #7 does not conduct all the way back through the atria. As a result — whereas the 5 retrograde P waves (YELLOW arrows) before beat #7 do make it all the way back through the atria (thereby preventing the SA Node from putting out its next sinus impulse during this time) — the SA Node then has a moment to recover (because of the failed retrograde conduction of beat #7). After a brief pause — the recovered SA Node begins to fire again, putting out the sinus P wave that appears before beat #8 (RED arrow) — which results in sinus-conducted beat #8.
- Advanced Subtlety: Note that I drew the dotted line representing retrograde conduction from junctional beat #7, with a slightly greater angle — to illustrate why retrograde conduction from beat #7 fails to conduct all the way back through the atria.
- Beat #8 in Rhythm A is sinus-conducted.
- There is no P wave before beat #9 — so this is another junctional beat.
- The P wave that occurs just after the QRS of beat #9 (3rd RED arrow in Rhythm A) is “on-time” — but this sinus P wave is not able to conduct to the ventricles because retrograde conduction from junctional beat #9 “blocks” it.
- There follows 3 junctional beats (beats #10,11,12) that do conduct all the way back through the atria to produce retrograde P waves (the final 3 YELLOW arrows in Rhythm A).
- Beat #13 is also junctional (because no P wave precedes it) — but the T wave of beat #13 is normal, because there is no retrograde P wave after this beat. In the same way that failure of retrograde conduction from junctional beat #7 allowed the RED arrow sinus P wave in front of beat #8 to conduct — the final sinus P wave in Rhythm A (ie, the last RED arrow in Figure-3) most probably would have conducted a sinus beat #14 had Rhythm A continued for 1 more beat.
- Final Beat: I saved beat #1 in Rhythm A for last. Since no P wave precedes beat #1 — this is a junctional beat. I believe the RED arrow P wave that occurs just after the QRS of beat #1 — acts similar to the sinus P wave that occurs just after beat #9, in that this P wave occurs too soon after beat #1 to conduct.
Figure-3: Laddergram illustration for Rhythm A in today's case. |
In Figure-4 — I've drawn a laddergram to illustrate events in Rhythm B:
- The principal difference between the mechanism of Rhythm A vs the mechanism of Rhythm B — is that there is no retrograde conduction in Rhythm B. Instead — RED arrows show that regular sinus P waves continue throughout the entire tracing.
- Most of these sinus P waves are unable to reach the ventricles — because their path is blocked by the underlying junctional rhythm. However — beats #3, 6, 10 and 14 are able to make it through the AV node, to be conducted to the ventricles. The laddergram in Figure-4 — illustrates the timing that is needed to allow this to happen.
- Advanced Subtlety: Note that the PR interval before beat #6 is slightly longer than the PR interval before the other 3 sinus-conducted beats (ie, beats #3,10,14). The reason for this — is that the P wave before beat #6 occurs closer to the preceding junctional beat — thereby slightly delaying the passage of this P wave through the AV node (which I illustrate with a PINK line showing a slightly greater inclination within the AV Nodal Tier compared to the inclination of the 3 other sinus-conducted beats that manifest shorter PR intervals).
Figure-4: Laddergram illustration for Rhythm B in today's case. |
QUESTION:
- Is there AV dissociation in today's rhythm? And, if so — WHY?
ANSWER:
There is AV dissociation in today's tracing — because many of the on-time P waves in Rhythm B are not related to neighboring QRS complexes (ie, Many of these on-time P waves in Rhythm B are not conducted to the ventricles).
- In Figure-4 — None of the P waves that terminate in a butt-end (seen in the upper portion of the AV Nodal Tier) are conducted to the ventricles.
PEARL #1: Despite the AV dissociation in Rhythm B — there is no evidence of AV block. This is because none of these P waves that failed to conduct in Figure-4 had a chance to conduct!
- The P waves that appear just after the QRS of beats #1, 4, 8 and 12 — all occur too close to the preceding QRS (These P waves fall within the absolute refractory period).
- The P waves that appear just before the QRS of beats #7,11 and 15 — all occur with too short of a PR interval to allow conduction.
- We have already ruled out 2nd- or 3rd-degree AV block (Pearl #1).
- To determine if AV dissociation in Figure-4 is the result of "usurpation" or "default" — We need to determine and compare the atrial and junctional rates. The P-P interval of sinus P waves (RED arrows) in Rhythm B is just over 4 large boxes in duration, which corresponds to a sinus P wave rate of ~70/minute.
- The R-R interval of junctional beats in Rhythm B — is 3.4 large boxes in duration, which corresponds to a junctional rate of ~85/minute. Even accounting for the young age of today's patient — this represents an accelerated junctional rhythm.
Putting It All Together:
The principal arrhythmia in today's case is an accelerated junctional rhythm at ~85/minute. This results in AV dissociation by "usurpation". Since the junctional pacemaker is faster than the underlying sinus rhythm (~85/minute — compared to the underlying sinus rate of ~70/minute) — the junctional pacemaker takes over the rhythm, with the exception of occasional sinus P waves that occur at "just the right moment" that they are able to "capture" the ventricles (ie, Beat #8 in Rhythm A — and beats #3,6,10 and 14 in Rhythm B).
- As noted in the history for today's case — this 14-year old boy with acute rhabdomyolysis was asymptomatic from the cardiac rhythm. There is no evidence of AV block in today's tracing. Instead — the primary arrhythmia is a slightly accelerated junctional rhythm that probably is the result of this patient's acute medical problem.
- No specific treatment is needed for this arrhythmia — which will probably resolve as this patient's medical condition improves.
==================================
Acknowledgment: My appreciation to Kianseng Ng and Leong Keen Wai (from Malaysia) for the case and this tracing.
==================================
Related ECG Blog Posts to Today’s Case:
- ECG Blog #205 — Reviews my Systematic Approach to 12-lead ECG Interpretation.
- ECG Blog #185 — Review of the Ps, Qs, 3R Approach for systematic rhythm interpretation.
- ECG Blog #188 — Reviews how to read and draw Laddergrams (with LINKS to more than 50 laddergram cases — many with step-by-step sequential illustration).
- ECG Blog #195 — Reviews the phenomenon known as Isorhythmic AV Dissociation.
- ECG Blog #192 — Reviews the 3 Causes of AV Dissociation (and emphasizes why AV Dissociation is not the same thing as Complete AV Block).
- CLICK HERE — for an instructive review on Rhabdomyolosis.
This is a Ken Grauer Blockbuster! You went more than the second mile and I came away learning much. Ah the laddergrams are graphic and truly we can climb that to a new level of understanding, Simplicity but there genius in simplicity! I enjoyed that. Many many Thanks
ReplyDeleteMY PLEASURE! There are times with complex rhythms when I know that until I can derive a laddergram that "makes sense" — I haven't "solved" the rhythm. So in addition to helping others — drawing a laddergram for a complex rhythm is sometimes the ONLY way that I am able to "solve" the case — :) THANKS again for your comment!
Delete