ECG Blog #494 — Much to Learn from this Case ...

The ECG in Figure-1 was obtained from an older woman who presents with a history of “indigestion” and CP (Chest Pain). She took 2 Tums, with enough relief of her symptoms to fall asleep — only to be awakened by 10/10 CP.

QUESTIONS:

• How would you interpret ECG #1 — which was recorded on arrival in the ED (Emergency Department)?
• Would you activate the cath lab? (Think to yourself about WHY you would or would not activate the cath lab on the basis of the above history and the ECG in Figure-1).

Figure-1: The initial ECG in today's case — recorded in the ED from an older woman with new CP. (To improve visualization — I've digitized the original ECG using PMcardio).

CASE Follow-Up:

The cath lab was not activated. The concern was that ECG #1 doesn't quite satisfy "STEMI criteria". That is, in this female patient — there is not more than 1.5 mm of ST elevation in leads V2 and V3 (Akbar and Mountfort — StatPearls, Oct. 2024).

• The initial Troponin was slightly elevated.
• The patient’s CP improved with Morphine that was given in the ED.

QUESTION:

• What are your thoughts on the above scenario?

==========================

The Case Continues:

A prior ECG on this patient was found (shown in Figure-2).

QUESTION:

• Does access to this prior ECG in any way alter your impression about this case?

Figure-2: A prior ECG on today's patient.

==========================

MY Thoughts: 

As per material in today's ADDENDUM — strict adherence to millimeter-based STEMI criteria will miss many acute OMIs ( = Occlusion-based Myocardial Infarctions). Simply stated — Whether or not STEMI criteria are satisfied depends more on When during the process the ECG is obtained, rather than whether or not there has been acute occlusion of a major coronary artery.

• This process is not "static". Instead — an OMI typically starts with acute coronary occlusion (accompanied by new-onset CP and ST elevation) — but along the way, the course may be "stuttering" (ie, Even before treatment — the "culprit" vessel may spontaneously reopen — and then spontaneously reclose — sometimes going back-and-forth between open and closed, until ultimately — the final state of the "culprit" artery is reached).
• Clues from the history that spontaneous reperfusion may have occurred at some point — are that the patient's symptoms are not constant — but instead wax and wane. If the initial ECG is obtained at a time after symptoms have lessened (or resolved) — then there may be some degree of "pseudo-normalization" (ie, Elevated ST segments may be returning to the baseline on their way toward ST depression and T wave inversion because the "culprit" artery has now opened).
• 
  
• PEARL #1: The history in today's case is potentially consistent with some degree of spontaneous reperfusion — because this patient's "indigestion" and initial CP improved enough for her to go to sleep. The reason it is important to be aware of this aspect in the history — is that it alerts YOU that the presence of subtle, seemingly minimal ST-T wave findings may be significant IF the ECG is in the process of "pseudo-normalizing". It also highlights that frequent serial ECGs may be needed to detect "dynamic" ST-T wave changes that may continue until the acute OMI has completely evolved.
• PEARL #2: The clinical problem — is that what spontaneously reopens — may just as easily spontaneously reclose. It is for this reason that once you recognize an acute OMI has occurred — that definitive treatment (ideally prompt cath with PCI) is still needed even if the patient is now pain-free, in order to prevent the "culprit" artery from reclosing.
• PEARL #3: Morphine should not be given until the decision has been made to perform prompt cath (or if 24/7 cath facilities are not available — until the decision has been made to begin thrombolytic therapy). This is because morphine may mask the patient's CP, giving a sense of false security that the process is over. We know this occurred in today's case — because the decision to perform cardiac catheterization was deferred until the following day.
• PEARL #4: Details in today's case are missing. We know this because: i) Temporal correlation between the presence and relative severity of this patient's CP and the initial ECG was not noted (The easiest way to document this correlation — is to write down on each ECG as it is recorded the patient's symptoms at that time on a scale of 1-to-10); and, ii) Frequent serial ECGs were apparently not done (ie, Repeating the initial ECG within 15-to-30 minutes will often reveal acute "dynamic" ST-T wave changes that confirm an ongoing acute process in need of prompt cath and definitive treatment).
• 
  
• PEARL #5: Frequent serial ECGs over the ensuing minutes to the first few hours should be obtained until confidence can be attained as to whether your patient has (or has not) had an acute OMI. That said, in a patient with worrisome new symptoms (as in today's case) — any amount of Troponin elevation is enough to satisfy clear indication for prompt cath.
• PEARL #6: Troponins are far from an ideal indicator of an acute process. Instead, they provide a "rear-view mirror" of myocardial damage that has already occurred (because of the natural delay after acute coronary occlusion until enough Troponin is released to be picked up in a blood test). And sometimes, despite acute OMI — the initial Troponin value may be negative (This may happen if the duration of acute coronary occlusion is very brief — as may be suggested by a history of CP that does not last for long).

========================== 

MY Impression of today's Initial ECG:

I thought prompt cath was indicated in today's case as soon as the initial ECG was recorded. For clarity in Figure-3 — I've labeled KEY findings that justify my impression that prompt cath was needed.

• Today's patient is an older woman who presents to the ED with new CP. This immediately places her in a higher-risk category for having an acute cardiac event.
• The rhythm in Figure-3 is sinus tachycardia at a rate just over 100/minute. It's important to be aware of how much less common it is for a patient with an uncomplicated acute MI to present with sinus tachycardia — unless "something else" is also going on (ie, heart failure; shock).
• There is bifascicular block ( = RBBB/LAHB) — which if acute, is an especially worrisome finding when it occurs in association with acute LAD (Left Anterior Descending) occlusion.
• And so, my "eye" was immediately drawn to the leads within the RED rectangle. Small-but-definite initial Q waves are seen in leads V1 and V2. Until proven otherwise — these initial Q waves are not part of an uncomplicated RBBB, but instead serve as a marker that anteroseptal infarction has occurred at some point in time. 
• Normally with RBBB — some amount of ST-T wave depression will be seen in one or more anterior leads. As a result — the small amount of ST elevation seen especially in lead V2 (but also, albeit to a lesser extent — in leads V3,V4,V5) — is significant and suggestive of an acute process. (Insistence on seeing a millimeter-amount of ST elevation in leads V2,V3 in a patient with RBBB, in which some ST depression is normally expected — makes no sense).
• RED arrows in a number of leads in Figure-3 highlight hyperacute ST-T waves (especially in leads V3,V4,V5 — in which these T waves are disproportionately enlarged compared to modest size of S waves in these leads).
• Finally — there is reciprocal ST depression in the inferior leads (especially as highlighted in lead III by the BLUE arrow).

BOTTOM Line: In this older woman with new CP (even without considering the elevated Troponin and availability of the prior ECG) — ECG #1 has to be interpreted as extremely worrisome given sinus tachycardia, bifascicular block (RBBB/LAHB), potentially significant Q waves in leads aVL,V1,V2 — and ST elevation in leads V2,V3 with hyperacute ST-T waves in leads V2-thru-V5 ==> acute proximal LAD occlusion until proven otherwise.

• Waiting until there is more ST elevation (which may or may not ever occur) — or waiting for more troponin results, serial ECGs or an Echo will achieve nothing — because it will not change the fact that prompt cath with PCI is needed.

Figure-3: I've labeled the initial ECG.

What about the Prior ECG?

Despite strong indication for prompt cath on the basis of history and the initial ECG — consultants (and your interventionist) may sometimes be reluctant to so promptly perform cardiac catheterization.

• PEARL #7: If some convincing of your consultant is needed — comparison of your patients initial ECG with either a prior ECG and/or with one or more serial ECGs will often show differences in ST-T wave morphology that prove the findings in the initial ECG are acute.

PEARL #8: All-too-often overlooked is how helpful it can be when comparing one ECG to another — to look lead-by-lead after placing both ECGs together.

• The prior ECG on today's patient was shown above in Figure-2. Isn't it much easier in Figure-4 to compare ECG #1 and ECG #2, now that I have placed both tracings together?
• Which of the ECG findings that I described above have we now proved to be acute in Figure-4 — now that we can compare these 2 tracings looking lead-by-lead?

Figure-4: Comparison of the initial ECG in today's case — with a prior ECG on this patient.

Comparison with the Prior ECG:

The rhythm in both of the tracings in Figure-4 is sinus at a rate close to 100/minute (The heart rate is slightly faster in ECG #1).

• It turns out that the bifascicular block ( = RBBB/LAHB) is not new! Instead, it was present whenever this prior tracing was done. On the one hand — it is good that this patient's acute OMI is not associated with new RBBB/LAHB, as this is an especially severe conduction defect when it occurs as the result of acute  LAD (Left Anterior Descending) occlusion. 
• On the other hand, the longstanding presence of bifascicular block, in association with QRS fragmentation ( = the notching that we see in multiple leads of ECG #2) — strongly suggests significant preexisting coronary disease in this older woman.
• The above said — this means that the ST-T wave changes that I described earlier for today's initial ECG are all new! There was no ST elevation in leads V2,V3 of ECG #2, nor were any of the T waves in leads V2-thru-V5 hyperacute in this prior tracing. In addition, the limb leads in the prior tracing did not show the changes highlighted by the colored arrows in ECG #1.
• 
  
• BOTTOM Line: Comparison in Figure-4 between today's initial ECG and this patient's prior tracing — confirms the acuity of diffuse ST-T wave changes in this older woman who now presents with new CP. Any doubt about the presence of acute LAD occlusion (and the need for prompt cath) should have been removed as soon as this prior tracing was found.

========================== 

CASE Conclusion:

• Cardiac cath was done a day after this patient came to the hospital. This confirmed the LAD "culprit" artery, which was stented. Unfortunately, by this time — the damage was done.  

==================================

Acknowledgment: My appreciation for the anonymous submission of this case and this tracing.

==================================

==================================

ADDENDUM #1 (8/30/2025):

• For More Material — regarding the ECG interpretation of OMIs (that do not satisfy millimeter-based STEMI criteria).

Figure-5: These are links found in the top menu on every page in this ECG Blog. They lead you to numerous posts with more on OMIs.

• In "My ECG Podcasts" — Check out ECG Podcast #2 (ECG Errors that Lead to Missing Acute Coronary Occlusion). NOTE: The timed-contents of this Podcast #2 facilitate quickly finding whatever key concepts you wish to review.
• Check out near the top of the "My ECG Videos" page, those videos from my MedAll ECG Talks that review the ECG diagnosis of acute MI — and how to recognize acute OMIs when STEMI criteria are not met (reviewed in ECG Blog #406 — Blog #407 — Blog #408).
• 
  
• Please NOTE — For each of the 6 MedAll videos at the top of the My ECG Videos page, IF you click on "More" in the description, you'll get a linked Contents that will allow you to jump to discussion of specific points (ie, at 5:29 in the 22-minute video for Blog #406 — you can jump to "You CAN recognize OMI without STEMI findings!" ).

P.S.: For a sobering, thought-provoking case discussed by cardiologist Dr. Willy Frick — with editorial Commentary by me at the bottom of the page (in the March 17, 2025 post) — Check out this case.

• As Dr. Frick and I highlight — not only is the current "STEMI paradigm" outdated — but in cases such as the one we describe, because providers waited until STEMI criteria were finally satisfied — cardiac cath and PCI were delayed for over 1 day.
• BUT — because the cath lab was activated within 1 hour of an ECG that finally fulfilled STEMI criteria — this case will go down in study registers as, "highly successful with rapid activation of the cath lab within 1 hour of the identification of a "STEMI". This erroneous interpretation of events totally ignores the clinical reality that this patient needlessly lost significant myocardium because the initial ECG (done >24 hours earlier) was clearly diagnostic of STEMI(-)/OMI(+) that was not acted on because providers were "stuck" on the STEMI protocol.
• The unfortunate result is generation of erroneous literature "support" suggesting validity of an outdated and no longer accurate paradigm.
• 
  
• KEY Clinical Reality: Many of the acute coronary occlusions that we see never develop ST elevation (or only develop ST elevation later in the course) — whereas attention to additional ECG criteria in the above references can enable us to identify acute OMI in many of these STEMI(-) cases.

ECG Blog #493 — Why Did the Patient Faint?

The ECG in Figure-1 was obtained from an older man with diabetes — who reports a syncopal episode a few days earlier. No chest pain. Hemodynamically stable — and essentially asymptomatic at the time the ECG in Figure-1 was recorded.

QUESTIONS:

• How would you interpret the ECG in Figure-1?
• Does the 12-lead ECG help in diagnosis of the rhythm?

Figure-1: The initial ECG in today's case — obtained from an older man who reports a syncopal episode several days earlier. No chest pain! (To improve visualization — I've digitized the original ECG using PMcardio).

============================

MY Thoughts on the ECG in Figure-1:

Today's case provides an excellent example of how the various parts of this tracing combine to "tell a story".

• Looking first at the long lead II rhythm strip: The QRS is narrow — the overall heart rate is slow — P waves are present and look fairly regular — but for most of the tracing, every-other-P-wave is not conducted.
• PEARL #1: The simple step of labeling P waves facilitates appreciating non-conduction of every-other-P-wave (RED arrows in Figure-2).
• PEARL #2: The fact that the atrial rhythm is regular, but for most of the tracing alternate "on-time" P waves are not conducting — defines the rhythm in Figure-2 as some form of 2nd-degree AV Block.

Figure-2: I've labeled P waves in today's initial ECG with RED arrows. This facilitates seeing that the underlying atrial rhythm is regular.

PEARL #3: As emphasized below in the Audio Pearl and Video Pearl that appear below in ADDENDUM #2 — There are 3 Types of 2nd-degree AV Block:

• Mobitz I (which is also called AV Wenckebach) — in which the PR interval progressively increases until a beat is dropped (non-conducted).
• Mobitz II — in which the PR interval remains constant until one or more beats in a row are non-conducted.
• 2nd-degree AV Block with 2:1 AV Conduction — in which P waves are regular, but every-other-P-wave is non-conducted. Because we never see 2 P waves in a row that are conducted — we cannot tell if the PR interval would increase if given a chance to do so — which is why we simply call this block 2nd-degree with 2:1 AV conduction.
• KEY Point: In my experience — well over 90% of all 2nd-degree AV blocks are of the Mobitz I type! There are many variations of Mobitz I, in which escape beats, PACs, PVCs, echo beats, etc may make recognition of this conduction disturbance more difficult, which is why it is helpful to remember that the vast majority of 2nd-degree AV blocks that we encounter are of the Mobitz I type.

PEARL #4: When contemplating what type of 2nd-degree AV block may be present — it is helpful to remember that:

• If the QRS complex is narrow — the block is almost always Mobitz I (Mobitz II is a much more worrisome form of 2nd-degree AV block that occurs lower down in the conduction system — which is why the QRS is almost always wide with Mobitz II. Pacing is usually needed with Mobitz II).
• If there is evidence of inferior and/or posterior MI on the ECG — then the block is almost certain to be Mobitz I (as Mobitz I is a common complication of inferior and/or posterior MIs — that often resolves without need for pacing if reperfusion of the "culprit" artery is successfully restored).

PEARL #5: It is uncommon to switch back-and-forth between Mobitz I and Mobitz II. Therefore, if on review of rhythm monitoring — We see primarily 2:1 AV conduction, but also periods of typical Mobitz I (with an increasing PR interval until a beat is dropped) — then it becomes extremely likely that all periods of AV block in that patient represent Mobitz I.

• Isn't this what we see in Figure-2? Two P waves in a row are conducted (The RED arrows before beats #4 and 5 in Figure-2) — and the PR interval increases until a beat is dropped (ie, Beats #4 and 5 make up an AV Wenckebach cycle with 3:2 AV conduction).

LOOK at Figures-3, -4, and -5 — in which I've colored P waves to facilitate recognition of events. The laddergrams illustrate the mechanism of today's rhythm — which is 2nd-degree AV Block of the Mobitz I Type, with primarily 2:1 AV conduction — but also with 1 grouping of 3:2 AV conduction that confirms AV Wenckebach!

• RED arrow P waves in Figure-3 highlight P waves conducting with a constant PR interval (the PR interval being ~0.21 second — or at the upper limit of normal).
• YELLOW arrow P waves are non-conducted.
• The PR interval increases before beat #5 (highlighted by the BLUE arrow) — after which the next P wave is "on-time" but non-conducted, thereby completing a 3:2 Wenckebach cycle.

Figure-3: Colored arrows highlight 2:1 AV conduction with one 3:2 AV Wenckebach cycle.

Figure-4: Laddergram illustration of Figure-3.

Figure-5: Single-colored laddergram. The rhythm is 2nd-degree AV Block of the Mobitz I Type, with primarily 2:1 AV conduction — and 1 grouping with 3:2 AV conduction that confirms AV Wenckebach!

================================

Is There Evidence of Inferior and/or Posterior MI?

Keeping in mind PEARL #4 — I turned my attention to the 12-lead ECG. Despite the fact that today's patient did not report any CP (Chest Pain) — my "eye" was immediately drawn to the inferior leads (within the RED rectangles in Figure-6).

• Although baseline wander makes assessment of ST-T waves in leads II and III difficult — each of the inferior leads in Figure-6 manifest small q waves — ST segment straightening with slight ST elevation and a hyperacute appearance.
• Confirmation that these inferior lead ST-T wave findings are real — is forthcoming from the presence of reciprocal ST depression in lead aVL.
• Further confirmation of an ongoing acute event is forthcoming from the flat, "shelf-like" ST depression in leads V2,V3,V4 (BLUE arrows in these leads) — with this indicating associated posterior MI. 

PEARL #6: Awareness that the inferior and posterior walls of the left ventricle typically have a common blood supply — helps greatly when seeking to confirm an acute OMI ( = Occlusion-based Myocardial Infarction):

• Seeing subtle ST-T wave changes in all 3 inferior leads, as well as the ST flattening and depression that is maximal in leads V2,V3,V4 (as we do in Figure-6) — confirms acute infero-postero OMI until proven otherwise.
• As per PEARL #4 — the "story" that is told by today's initial ECG is completed by the finding of Mobitz I 2nd-degree AV Block for the rhythm.

PEARL #7: The story conveyed by ECG #1 tells us that today's patient did have a recent acute MI despite the absence of CP (ie, Today's patient had a "Silent" MI — as defined in the brief Audio Pearl below in today's ADDENDUM).

• This MI most probably occurred a few days earlier, at the time of this patient's syncopal episode — but despite bradycardia and the 2nd-degree AV Block seen in Figure-6, the patient was hemodynamically stable and essentially asymptomatic at the time this ECG was recorded. Nevertheless — Troponin was still elevated.

Figure-6: I've labeled leads highlighting the acute changes of acute infero-postero OMI.

================================

Today's CASE Continues:

Because the patient was admitted to a non-cath-capable hospital — initial treatment did not include angioplasty. The next morning — the repeat ECG shown in Figure-7 was obtained. The patient remained hemodynamically stable and essentially asymptomatic.

QUESTIONS: Regarding Figure-7:

• In light of clinical events in this case — How do you interpret the repeat ECG? 
• Does this repeat tracing suggest that treatment has been successful?
• Is the patient still in 2nd-degree AV Block in ECG #2?

Figure-7: Comparison between today's initial ECG — with the repeat ECG done the following morning.

ANSWERS: 

The rate of the rhythm in ECG #2 is clearly faster than it was in the initial tracing. I'll defer closer inspection of the rhythm for a moment — but at first glance, I see sinus-conducted beats but no non-conducted P waves.

• PEARL #8: The most time-efficient way to interpret serial ECGs — is to place both tracings side-by-side (as they are in Figure-7) — and to compare lead-by-lead — as well as to compare anatomic area by anatomic area. Unless you compare each tracing with the other tracing going lead-by-lead — it is all too easy to overlook subtle changes. 
• It is also much faster to compare tracings going lead-by-lead! (because you won't have to be going back-and-forth taking multiple looks because you forgot what some complexes look like).

In the limb leads:

• Compared to the 3 leads within the RED rectangles in the initial tracing — the ST elevation in the inferior leads looks less acute in ECG #2 (less straightening of the ST segment takeoff — and less J-point elevation). The terminal T wave inversion is now more pronounced, especially in lead III (which strongly suggests there has been some reperfusion of the "culprit" artery). The inferior Q waves are unchanged.
• Consistent with this suggestion of reperfusion in ECG #2 — is the increase in lead aVL of terminal T wave positivity (ie, the mirror-image opposite picture of the increased T wave inversion seen in lead III).

In the chest leads:

• The R wave in lead V2 is now clearly predominant. This earlier transition in the chest leads is consistent with evolution of posterior OMI (ie, positive Mirror Test — as described in ECG Blog #317).
• The most remarkable change in ECG #2 — is the evolution of chest lead T waves that have become taller, thinner and more symmetric, especially in leads V2,V3,V4,V5 (ie, positive Mirror Test — with this T wave appearance indicating posterior wall reperfusion).

================================

To facilitate assessment of the change in the cardiac rhythm between the 2 tracings in Figure-7 — I have put the long lead II rhythm strips from these tracings together in Figure-8.

• What do you see? 

Figure-8: Comparison of the rhythms in ECG #1 and ECG #2.

Comparison of the 2 Rhythm Strips in Figure-8:

As illustrated in Figures-3, -4, and -5 — the rhythm in the long lead II of ECG #1 is 2nd-degree AV Block of the Mobitz I Type, with primarily 2:1 AV conduction — but also with one 2-beat grouping with 3:2 AV conduction that confirms AV Wenckebach!

• The "good news" clinically — is that the 2nd-degree AV Block has resolved the following morning by the time ECG #2 was recorded!
• RED arrows in the long lead II rhythm strip in ECG #2 — indicate a fairly regular sinus rhythm for the first 6 beats, albeit with 1st-degree AV Block (PR interval ~0.24 second).
• Beat #7 in ECG #2 is a PAC (Premature Atrial Contraction) — with the small amplitude negative P wave before beat #7 clearly indicating a different atrial site of impulse formation ( = the ORANGE arrow in ECG #2).
• I suspect the 3 GREEN arrow P waves that follow beat #7 also originate from a different site in the atria — in that all 3 of these P waves are of similar size and shape to each other, and smaller than the first 6 RED arrow P waves. 

====================================

• NOTE (Beyond-the-Core) — Alternatively, WB Ren in the EKG Club (8/22/2025) has suggested that rather than an ectopic atrial site — a more logical (and more probable) explanation for the change in P wave morphology (GREEN arrow P waves following Beat #7 in Figure-8) is Phase 4 Block within a part of the SA Node, resulting in depolarization of only a portion of the SA Node, therefore manifesting transient change in P wave morphology until another PAC or PVC is able to reset the membrane potential (by a similar mechanism to what happens in the AV Node with Paroxysmal AV Block in patients with a severely diseased Purkinje conduction system).
• For those interested — CLICK HERE for an excellent explanation of Phase-4 (Bradycardia-Dependent) Block.
• More on PAVB (Paroxysmal AV Block) in ECG Blog #419 —

====================================

BOTTOM Line: Whether the change in P wave morphology that I describe above in ECG #2 represents a wandering atrial pacemaker, simply change in atrial focus resulting from the PAC, or Phase-4 Block within an ischemic SA Node precipitated by a PAC   — is uncertain.

• Regardless, the rhythm in ECG #2 is most probably benign — and — this new rhythm represents significant improvement compared to ECG #1 because: i) The ventricular rate has increased, and is no longer bradycardic; and, ii) There is no longer 2nd-degree AV block.
• PEARL #9: The resolution of 2nd-degree AV Block in ECG #2 is yet one more sign (in addition to the reperfusion T waves described above in ECG #2) — that either through treatment or spontaneously, there has been a certain amount of reperfusion of the "culprit" artery (this point highlights the 2nd part of PEARL #4).

================================

Final CASE Follow-Up:

Cardiac cath was delayed in today's case until the patient could be transferred to a cath-capable facility. Results of cardiac catheterization and treatment interventions were as follows:

• 100% RCA occlusion and 90% narrowing of the proximal LAD (without other significant disease).
• An EF = 56% on Echo. 
• PCI to the RCA with IVUS (IntraVascular UltraSound) was performed — and staged PCI to the LAD was planned. The patient did well.

==================================

Acknowledgment: My appreciation to Aarthi Natarajan (from Chennai, India) for the case and this tracing.

==================================

==================================

ADDENDUM #1 (8/23/2025):

• For More Material — regarding ECG interpretation of OMIs (that do not satisfy millimeter-based STEMI criteria).

Figure-9: These are links found in the top menu on every page in this ECG Blog. They lead you to numerous posts with more on OMIs.

• In "My ECG Podcasts" — Check out ECG Podcast #2 (ECG Errors that Lead to Missing Acute Coronary Occlusion).
• In 'My ECG Videos" — Check out near the top of that page VIDEOS from my MedAll ECG Talks, that review the ECG diagnosis of acute MI — and how to recognize acute OMIs when STEMI criteria are not met (reviewed in ECG Blog #406 — Blog #407 — Blog #408).
• 
  
• Please NOTE — For each of the 6 MedAll videos at the top of the My ECG Videos page, IF you click on "More" in the description, you'll get a linked Contents that will allow you to jump to discussion of specific points (ie, at 5:29 in the 22-minute video for Blog #406 — you can jump to "You CAN recognize OMI without STEMI findings!" ).

P.S.: For a sobering, thought-provoking case discussed by cardiologist Dr. Willy Frick — with editorial Commentary by me at the bottom of the page (in the March 17, 2025 post) — Check out this case.

• As Dr. Frick and I highlight — not only is the current "STEMI paradigm" outdated — but in cases such as the one we describe, because providers waited until STEMI criteria were finally satisfied — cardiac cath and PCI were delayed for over 1 day.
• BUT — because the cath lab was activated within 1 hour of an ECG that finally fulfilled STEMI criteria — this case will go down in study registers as, "highly successful with rapid activation of the cath lab within 1 hour of the identification of a "STEMI". This erroneous interpretation of events totally ignores the clinical reality that this patient needlessly lost significant myocardium because the initial ECG (done >24 hours earlier) was clearly diagnostic of STEMI(-)/OMI(+) that was not acted on because providers were "stuck" on the STEMI protocol.
• The unfortunate result is generation of erroneous literature "support" suggesting validity of an outdated and no longer accurate paradigm.
• The Clinical Reality: Many acute coronary occlusions never develop ST elevation (or only develop ST elevation later in the course) — whereas attention to additional ECG criteria in the above references can enable us to identify acute OMI in many of these STEMI(-) cases.

==========================     

ADDENDUM #2 (8/23/2025):

• Below from ECG Blog #228 — a brief Audio Pearl on "Silent" MI.
• I've also included below an Audio Pearl — a Video Pearl — and links for download of PDFs reviewing the ECG diagnosis of AV Blocks.

=======================================

—  — 

ECG Media PEARL #44 (3:30 minutes Audio) — What is a "Silent" MI? — and How OFTEN do "Silent MIs" occur? (results from Framingham).

 

—  —

ECG Media PEARL #4 (4:30 minutes Audio): — takes a brief look at the AV Blocks — and focuses on WHEN to suspect Mobitz I.

My GOAL in the 15-minute ECG Video below — is to clarify ECG diagnosis of the 2nd-Degree AV Blocks, of which there are 3 Types:

• Mobitz I ( = AV Wenckebach).
• Mobitz II.
• 2nd-Degree AV Block with 2:1 AV conduction.

This 15-minute ECG Video (Media PEARL #52) — Reviews the 3 Types of 2nd-Degree AV Block — plus — the hard-to-define term of "high-grade" AV block. I supplement this material with the following 2 PDF handouts.

• Section 2F (6 pages = the "short" Answer) from my ECG-2014 Pocket Brain book provides quick written review of the AV Blocks (This is a free download).
• Section 20 (54 pages = the "long" Answer) from my ACLS-2013-Arrhythmias Expanded Version provides detailed discussion of WHAT the AV Bocks are — and what they are not!

=======================

Related ECG Blog Posts to Today’s Case: 

• ECG Blog #185 — Review of the Ps, Qs, 3R Approach for systematic rhythm interpretation.
• ECG Blog #188 — Reviews how to read and draw Laddergrams (with LINKS to more than 50 laddergram cases — many with step-by-step sequential illustration).
•  
• ECG Blog #164 — Which reviews step-by-step the diagnosis of a Mobitz I 2nd-degree AV block (with sequential laddergram illustration).
• 
  
• ECG Blog #168 — A complex dual-level AV Wenckebach (Laddergram).
• 
  
• ECG Blog #154 and ECG Blog #55 and ECG Blog #224 and ECG Blog #232 — Acute MI with AV Wenckebach.
• 
  
• ECG Blog #63 — Mobitz I with Junctional Escape Beats.
• ECG Blog #344 — Mobitz I vs II vs neither ...
• ECG Blog #416 — Another OMI & AV Block ...
• ECG Bog #472 — Another AV Block ...